S. Michael Houdmann Supporter Got Questions Ministries

In Matthew 21:44, Jesus says, "He who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, but he on whom it falls will be crushed." The key to understanding this statement lies in the context of the vers...

Login or Sign Up to view the rest of this answer.

July 01 2013 • 0 responses • Vote Up • Share • Report

Nils Jansma Supporter Missionary in San Diego California

Why is Jesus called the stumbling stone in Matthew 21:43-44? When Jesus entered Jerusalem for that last Passover, the crowd met him with shouts of acclamation drawn from Psalm 118:26 “... Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD!” After this triumphant entry, he went to the Temple area and cleansed it of commercial activities. The next day he again entered the Temple courts, but this time began teaching. The Pharisees began to assault him with words in an effort to discredit his teaching particularly with regard to the question of his messiahship and being an heir to David’s throne. At this time Jesus posed the question about the rejected stone by quoting Psalm 118:22-23, "Haven't you ever read what the Scriptures say, "'The stone the builders didn't accept has become the most important stone of all. The Lord has done it. It is wonderful in our eyes'?” (Matthew 21:42) This was obviously a rhetorical question. Jesus knew that the Temple authorities were very familiar with the Psalmist’s words because they sang those words often in the many Festivals held annually.

In order to better understand the significance of Jesus’ words, we need to know something about stone cutting practices at that time and before. In the land of Israel, builders worked primarily with stone because of its abundance and the lack of usable wood for heavy construction. The archaeology of that day reveals that masons were highly skilled. We even have modern day evidence of that skill by observing what is called the “wailing wall” which still serves as a retaining wall for the Temple platform today. The large heavy stones used in the renovations of the Temple by Herod are cut so precisely you can’t slip a credit card between them. This precision was absolutely necessary for the building’s long-term stability. A mis-fit stone could in time compromise the structural integrity of the whole edifice. 

The illustration of Psalm envisions mason’s cutting a stone that was deemed unfit to use because it appeared to be so misshapen that is wasn’t even good enough to use as a spare but was rejected completely to the junk pile as worthless. Then after more measurements were made and a number of other stones were tired but also failed, the stone cutters were at a loss as to what to do. Then someone suggested, ”let’s look through the refuse pile to see if there is a suitable scrap we can recut.” To their amazement, the stone that had already been cut and rejected now fit perfectly. It was truly a fortunate miracle in their eyes. (Psalm 118:23)

The original rabbinic interpretation of 118 Psalm was applied to King David. When God told Samuel to anoint one of Jessie’s sons as king, none was found among them who God approved. Samuel was told to inquire about more sons and found that the youngest was in the field attending sheep. That youngest son that was originally rejected by his family became the greatest King of Israel. Rabbinic interpretation also eventually applied this verse to the greater son of David, the Messiah. 

This background gives us insight into why Jesus may have used this illustration to those present. He knew the Pharisees were very familiar with both the Davidic and Messianic interpretation of these Verses. Jesus, in essence, was warning them, “Just as David was rejected at first but was later recognized as God’s choice for King of Israel, you are likewise rejecting me.”

Consequently, this rejection of Jesus as the “most important stone,” has brought God’s judgement against them. The Chief Priest, and no doubt, many who heard Jesus’ words about the rejected stone were forcefully reminded again when Peter and John testified before them that, among other things, said: “Scripture says that Jesus is "'the stone you builders did not accept. But it has become the most important stone of all.' You can't be saved by believing in anyone else. God has given us no other name under heaven that will save us." (Acts 4:10)

June 06 2018 • 0 responses • Vote Up • Share • Report

Jeffrey Johnson Supporter

Why is Jesus called the stumbling stone in Matthew 21:43-44?

Jesus is called the "stumbling stone" in Matthew 21:43-44 because he is a figure of judgment for those who reject him. While he is the "rock of salvation" for believers, he becomes an immovable "stumbling stone" for the disobedient, causing them to "trip and fall" into ruin because their disbelief is contrary to God's expectations and plan. This is explained in the context of a parable where the "stone that the builders rejected" becomes the "chief cornerstone," meaning he is essential to building the kingdom of God, but those who reject him will face judgment. 

Quoting the psalmist, Jesus Christ foretold: "Did you never read in the Scriptures, 'Wherefore I say unto you, The kingdom of God will be taken away from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof'? 44 [And he that falleth on this stone Will be sorely bruised; But on whomsoever it may fall It will utterly destroy him.]" Rotherham Bible.

Conclusion:

The outcomes for those who encounter the stone:

For believers: Those who "fall on" the stone (submit to it) will be "broken" into a state of repentance and be saved by being part of the new kingdom built upon him.

For unbelievers: Those upon whom the stone "falls" (reject him) will be "ground to powder" (crushed to ruin) because they have become the enemies of the foundation of salvation. 

In Matthew 21:43-44, Jesus calls himself the "stumbling stone" to warn the Jewish religious leaders that their rejection of him will lead to their destruction. By rejecting Jesus, they were acting like builders who reject the essential cornerstone of a building, and as a result, they would be crushed by the very thing they cast aside.

3 days ago • 0 responses • Vote Up • Share • Report